December 05, 2025 9:22 am

Author Topic: sko_ford's A mod  (Read 176582 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline racerjohnson

  • Traditionalist...or...I post to much.
  • *
  • Posts: 1379
  • Karma: +0/-1
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
sko_ford's A mod
« Reply #90 on: April 01, 2008 4:30 am »
what radiator will that grille shell be covering?
The problem with having an artistic eye is that you always end up making more work for yourself. -Cleatus on the HAMB

Offline sko_ford

  • Suedes Member
  • Traditionalist...or...I post to much.
  • *
  • Posts: 2166
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
sko_ford's A mod
« Reply #91 on: April 01, 2008 10:08 am »
4 core 60's mustang.  and 40 by my tape its an inch lower
WANTED: Mel Tillis valve covers

Offline Eyeball

  • Moderator
  • Traditionalist...or...I post to much.
  • *
  • Posts: 6865
  • Karma: +2/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
sko_ford's A mod
« Reply #92 on: April 01, 2008 2:33 pm »
You will have to toss that tape aside to see if your car has the correct "look" or "flow” body and frame lines can change the way it looks. My A sedan had the radiator taller than the cowl but your eye was not drawn to it cuz of the carbs breaking the line and when I put the radiator support rods in I mounted them lower on the radiator so they were.
soaken wet shoes and winkled fingers...
hours and hours
inch at a time...

henryj1951 HAMB

Offline pinstriper40

  • Traditionalist...or...I post to much.
  • *
  • Posts: 1150
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
sko_ford's A mod
« Reply #93 on: April 01, 2008 5:23 pm »
Quote from: "Eyeball"
You will have to toss that tape aside to see if your car has the correct "look" or "flow” body and frame lines can change the way it looks. My A sedan had the radiator taller than the cowl but your eye was not drawn to it cuz of the carbs breaking the line and when I put the radiator support rods in I mounted them lower on the radiator so they were.


So why are you called Eyeball?
*Street is Neat*

Offline racerjohnson

  • Traditionalist...or...I post to much.
  • *
  • Posts: 1379
  • Karma: +0/-1
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
sko_ford's A mod
« Reply #94 on: April 01, 2008 9:41 pm »
Quote from: "Eyeball"
You will have to toss that tape aside to see if your car has the correct "look" or "flow” body and frame lines can change the way it looks. My A sedan had the radiator taller than the cowl but your eye was not drawn to it cuz of the carbs breaking the line and when I put the radiator support rods in I mounted them lower on the radiator so they were.


With your body channeled so much, there may only be so much you can do to lower the grille shell. You may have to adjust (ie. raise) the body a bit. I have a 65 4 core mustang radiator. It's sitting ON the crossmember and my grille shell still sits higher than my cowl too. Unlike Eyeball and using his carbs to break up "the line," I had to use the gas tank to break the line (I didn't have a roof!). On my roadster, theres that imaginary line that goes from the lip on the back of my "cockpit" to the grille shell. I just made damn sure the gas tank broke that line.  It's ok right now, but I will be modifiying the corners of the upper rad. tank so I can lower my shell another inch if needed. You may have to do the same. I'm trying to avoid raising the body to compensate, but you may have to fiddle with the front and rear height of your body just to make the radiator shell look right. My support rods will be used to maintain the flow I want the top of the body to have, but will be closer to the engine than the body "line" so the engine doesn't look like it's sitting so darn low.
You can try my radiator if you need to play with it. It'll turn out great. Just gotta fiddle and stare at it  alot!
The problem with having an artistic eye is that you always end up making more work for yourself. -Cleatus on the HAMB

Offline Serious

  • Suedes Member
  • Traditionalist...or...I post to much.
  • *
  • Posts: 1259
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
sko_ford's A mod
« Reply #95 on: April 01, 2008 9:52 pm »
Ross id raise the front of the body before i lowered the rear,  just my .02

Offline racerjohnson

  • Traditionalist...or...I post to much.
  • *
  • Posts: 1379
  • Karma: +0/-1
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
sko_ford's A mod
« Reply #96 on: April 01, 2008 10:00 pm »
Quote from: "Serious"
Ross id raise the front of the body before i lowered the rear,  just my .02


I agree. Leaning the grills shell forward so It's almost vertical would change the look of the whole car a lot too.

Of course, do we neccessarily want all of our cars looking the same?
The problem with having an artistic eye is that you always end up making more work for yourself. -Cleatus on the HAMB

Offline sko_ford

  • Suedes Member
  • Traditionalist...or...I post to much.
  • *
  • Posts: 2166
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
sko_ford's A mod
« Reply #97 on: April 02, 2008 12:45 pm »
i am looking at raising the front but i still want to lower the back to cover the frame. what the point in chanel ing a car for it dosent cover the frame
WANTED: Mel Tillis valve covers

Offline sko_ford

  • Suedes Member
  • Traditionalist...or...I post to much.
  • *
  • Posts: 2166
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
apart
« Reply #98 on: April 02, 2008 12:58 pm »
so i blew it apart last night so i can start fixing and welding the bits and peices that i couldnt with every thing in the way tonight.  and this is my shackle and mount that link to meet so i'm gong to look in to haveing the spring eyes rerolled shorter so this doesnt hit
WANTED: Mel Tillis valve covers

Offline Tom

  • Traditionalist...or...I post to much.
  • *
  • Posts: 3436
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: apart
« Reply #99 on: April 02, 2008 1:24 pm »
Quote from: "sko_ford"
.  and this is my shackle and mount that link to meet so i'm gong to look in to haveing the spring eyes rerolled shorter so this doesnt hit


I had a similar problem, I re-rolled them my self.
"A rat rod is a hot rod with poor workmanship". Roger S.

Offline Eyeball

  • Moderator
  • Traditionalist...or...I post to much.
  • *
  • Posts: 6865
  • Karma: +2/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
RE: Re: apart
« Reply #100 on: April 02, 2008 2:08 pm »
I think even if you shorten the spring you are still going to bottom out at that point. Is there any way to change the designe and hang it below or make a set like a modle A has on top of the axle.
soaken wet shoes and winkled fingers...
hours and hours
inch at a time...

henryj1951 HAMB

Offline Tom

  • Traditionalist...or...I post to much.
  • *
  • Posts: 3436
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
RE: Re: apart
« Reply #101 on: April 02, 2008 2:31 pm »
I agree with Tim, It needs to have full movement, my spring was so long that the shackles hung straight down. They need to be at about a 45 degree angle to the center of the car.
"A rat rod is a hot rod with poor workmanship". Roger S.

Offline sko_ford

  • Suedes Member
  • Traditionalist...or...I post to much.
  • *
  • Posts: 2166
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
RE: Re: apart
« Reply #102 on: April 02, 2008 2:43 pm »
to change it to hang below i'd have to cut about 4" out of the kick of the frame and to put it on top would put the u joint right next to my kidny and still wouldnt be far enought apart
WANTED: Mel Tillis valve covers

Offline Tom

  • Traditionalist...or...I post to much.
  • *
  • Posts: 3436
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
RE: Re: apart
« Reply #103 on: April 02, 2008 3:17 pm »
I'll take a pic of mine and post it tomorrow.
"A rat rod is a hot rod with poor workmanship". Roger S.

Offline Eyeball

  • Moderator
  • Traditionalist...or...I post to much.
  • *
  • Posts: 6865
  • Karma: +2/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
RE: Re: apart
« Reply #104 on: April 02, 2008 4:50 pm »
I think you better fix it or it will be a problem that will bother you forever. Plus there is always a chance that something will bend or break over time if it does hit.
soaken wet shoes and winkled fingers...
hours and hours
inch at a time...

henryj1951 HAMB